Lo viejo funciona

Tecnología, instituciones y guerra en tiempos de disrupción tecnológica

Autores/as

  • Aureliano da Ponte UCM-UNDEF
  • Leandro Ocón

Palabras clave:

estrategia, guerras, conflictos armados, revolución tecnológica, territorios

Resumen

Este artículo examina la relación entre la innovación tecnológica y los fundamentos del poder militar en la guerra contemporánea. Sostiene que las tecnologías emergentes y de doble uso no se traducen automáticamente en ventajas estratégicas, sino que dependen de capacidades institucionales, industriales y logísticas preexistentes. El estudio desarrolla un marco analítico que vincula innovación, Soberanía Tecnológica (ST) y base industrial, conceptualizándolas como condiciones habilitantes y limitantes de la capacidad estratégica. Se propone un estudio comparado de dos conflictos recientes: Rusia–Ucrania (2022–2024) e Israel–Irán (2025). A partir del análisis de la adopción tecnológica, la absorción institucional y el sostenimiento industrial logístico, los resultados muestran que la innovación sólo produce efectos operacionales sostenibles cuando se inserta en sistemas de producción resilientes, estructuras organizacionales y cadenas de suministro capaces de escalar y reponer capacidades bajo condiciones de interdependencia armada. Los hallazgos indican que la disrupción tecnológica no sustituye las bases materiales e institucionales de la guerra; por el contrario, las revaloriza al demostrar que la eficacia estratégica depende de estructuras duraderas de producción, logística y gobernanza.

Citas

Andreoni, A. y Gregory, M. (2013). Why and how does manufacturing still matter: old rationales, new realities. Revue d'économie industrielle, 144, 4, 21-57. https://journals.openedition.org/rei/5668

Auslin, M. (2024, Febuary 14). Wyoming hits the rare-earth mother lode. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/wyoming-hits-the-rare-earth-mother-lode-natural-resources-policy-china-mining-8e559cec

Biddle, S. (2004). Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton University Press.

Biddle, S. (2023). Back in the trenches: Why new technology hasn’t revolutionized warfare in Ukraine. Foreign Affairs, 102(5). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/back-trenches-technology-warfare

Brooks, R. (2008). Shaping Strategy: The Civil-Military Politics of Strategic Assessment. Princeton University Press.

Brose, C. (2020). The new revolution in military affairs: War’s sci-fi future. Foreign Affairs, 99(3), 122–134. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2020-04-14/new-revolution-military-affairs

Chang, Ha-Joon y Andreoni Antonio (2020). Industrial Policy in the 21st Century. Development and Change, 51,2,324-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12570

Cohen, E. A. (2002). Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartime. Free Press.

Danylyuk, Oleksandr and Jack Watling (2025). Winning the Industrial War Comparing Russia, Europe and Ukraine, 2022–24. RUSI Occasional Paper April 2025. Disponible en línea: https://static.rusi.org/winning-the-industrial-war-comparing-russia-europe-ukraine-2022-24.pdf

da Ponte, A. León, G. and Alvarez, I. (2023). Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: an empirical approach. Telecommunications Policy, 47, 1.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102459

da Ponte, A. (2024). La Soberanía Tecnológica como nueva racionalidad de la política de innovación: desarrollo conceptual, análisis empírico y nuevas herramientas de medición. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

da Ponte, A., & Ocón, L. (2019). Reconceptualizando la relación entre tecnología, instituciones y guerra. Urvio: Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, (25). https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/issue/view/181

da Ponte, A. y Ocon, A. L. (2016). “La industrialización como problema de defensa: Debates y “saber convencional” (pp.27-69). En: Industria y Defensa: Economía Política, pensamiento estratégico y autonomía tecnológica. 1884 Círculo Militar.

Drezner, D. W. (2024). How Everything Became National Security: And National Security Became Everything. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/how-everything-became-national-security-drezner

EDA (2025). Defence Data. https://www.edrmagazine.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2025-EDA_DefenceData_Web.pdf

EDA (2024). Annual Report. eda---annual-report-2024---webdfcdc23fa4d264cfa776ff000087ef0f.pdf

European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) (2025, October 3). Israel and Iran on the brink: Preventing the next war, https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/israel-and-iran-brink-preventing-next-war

Evron, Y., & Bitzinger, R. A. (2023). The fourth industrial revolution and military-civil fusion: A new paradigm for military innovation? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009289695

Geranmayeh Ellie (2025). Israel and Iran on the brink: Preventing the next war. EUISS. https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/israel-and-iran-brink-preventing-next-war

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2023). Underground empire: How America weaponized the world economy. Macmillan (Henry Holt and Co.)

Gady, F.-S. (2020). Battlefield drones in Nagorno-Karabakh. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

Galeotti, M. (2023). Russian military thinking and adaptation in the Ukraine war. Survival, 65(6), 7–24. https://www.iiss.org/publications/survival

Gjesvik, L. (2023). Private infrastructure in weaponized interdependence. Review of International Political Economy, 30(2), 722–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2069145

Gilli, A., & Gilli, M. (2023). Why China has not caught up yet: Military-technological superiority and the limits of imitation, reverse engineering, and cyber espionage. International Security, 43(3), 141–189. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00337.

Globerman, S. (1978). Canadian science policy and technological sovereignty. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 4(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/3549872

Grant, P. (1983). Technological sovereignty: Forgotten factor in the ‘hitech’ razzamatazz. Prometheus, 1(2), 239–270. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08109028308628930

Gray, C. S. (1999). Modern Strategy. Oxford University Press.

Gray, C. S. (2010). The strategy bridge: Theory for practice. Oxford University Press

Gray, J. E. (2021). The geopolitics of ‘Platforms’: The TikTok challenge. Internet Policy Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1557

Hamilton, Charles (2025, 12 febrero). The future of military logistics is predictive. Defense One. https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2025/02/future-military-logistics-predictive/402939/

Horowitz, M. C. (2010). The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics. Princeton University Press.

IISS (2025). The Military Balance 2025, The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).

Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA). (2025, August). Shielded by fire: Middle East air defense during the June 2025 Israel–Iran war. https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Shielded-by-Fire.pdf

Jones, S. G., McCabe, R., & Palmer, A. (2023, February). Ukrainian innovation in a war of attrition. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/ukrainian-innovation-war-attrition

Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (3.ª ed.). Stanford University Press.

Kennedy, Paul (2016) Auge y Caída de las Grandes Potencias. Ed. Titivillius

Kofman, M., & Lee, R. (2023, September 4). Perseverance and adaptation: Ukraine’s counteroffensive at three months. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2023/09/perseverance-and-adaptation-ukraines-counteroffensive-at-three-months/

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661

Kofman, M. (2023). Assessing the Russian military’s performance in Ukraine. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/

Kofman, M., & Lee, R. (2023). Not Built for Purpose: The Russian Military’s Ill-Fated Force Design. CNA Analysis & Solutions.

Lehdonvirta, V., Wú, B., & Hawkins, Z. (2025). Weaponised interdependence in a bipolar world: how economic forces and security interests shape the global reach of US and Chinese cloud data centres. Review of International Political Economy, 32(5), 1442–1467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2489077

León, G. (2024). Análisis de la autonomía estratégica abierta digital de la UE: Retos tecnológicos y geopolíticos en un mundo convulso (Monografías RADE, No. 1). Real Academia de Doctores de España. https://www.rade.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Monografias-RADE-1.pdf

León, G. & da Ponte, A. (2023). Soberanía tecnológica de la UE, ¿un objetivo alcanzable?, aproximación conceptual y derivaciones prácticas. Revista Economía Industrial, 427, 17-24 https://www.mintur.gob.es/Publicaciones/Publicacionesperiodicas/EconomiaIndustrial/RevistaEconomiaIndustrial/427/GONZALO%20LEON%20Y%20AURELIANO%20DA%20PONTE.pdf

León, G., & da Ponte, A. (2020). Entre la geopolítica y la soberanía tecnológica: Desafíos para la Unión Europea en las redes de innovación y producción de comunicaciones móviles, semiconductores e inteligencia artificial (Documento de Trabajo 08/2020). Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. https://www.defensa.gob.es/ceseden/-/desafios_para_la_union_europea_en_las_redes_de_innovacio_y_produccion_de_comunicaciones_moviles_semiconductores_e_inteligencia_artificial

Levy, D., Pinko, E., y Shamir, E. (2026). Asymmetric war at sea: The doctrine of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN). Journal of Strategic Studies, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2025.2598757

Lind, W. S., Nightengale, K., Schmitt, J. F., Sutton, J. W., & Wilson, G. I. (1989). The changing face of war: Into the fourth generation. Marine Corps Gazette, 73(10), 22–26. https://d-n-i.net/fcs/4th_gen_war_gazette.htm

Martí, C. (2024) “El papel de la tecnología en los recientes conflictos de Ucrania y Gaza. Una valoración inicial. Real Instituto Elcano. https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/analisis/el-papel-de-la-tecnologia-en-los-recientes-conflictos-de-ucrania-y-gaza-una-valoracion-inicial/

Mohan, Christopher (2025, 12 febrero). Innovating Defense Logistics: From the Industrial Base to the Front Line. National Logistics Forum. https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2025/LTGCMohan.pdf

Murray, Williamson & Millett, Allan (1998) Military Innovation in the Interwar Period. Cambridge University Press.

Niederkofler, M. (2025). Drones win battles, components win wars. Royal United Services Institute. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/drones-win-battles-components-win-wars

O’Hanlon, M. E. (2009). The science of war: Defense budgeting, military technology, logistics, and combat outcomes. Princeton University Press.

Posen, B. R. (1984). The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars. Cornell University Press.

Rácz, A. (2023). The evolution of Russian military strategy. Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://fiia.fi/en/publication/fog-of-falsehood#:~:text=It%20is%20concluded%20that%20the,corrected%20in%20the%20online%20version.

Radin, A., Reach, C., Matthews, L., & Boston, S. (2022). The future of warfare in the Caucasus. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1234-1.html

Radin, A., Holynska, K., Tretter, C., & Van Bibber, T. (2024). Lessons from the war in Ukraine for space: Challenges and opportunities for future conflicts. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2950-1.html

International Institute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah). (2025, June 18). Conflict watch: The Israel-Iran war (June 15–16, 2025). https://rasanah-iiis.org/english/monitoring-and-translation/reports/conflict-watch-the-israel-iran-war-june-15-16-2025/

Reuters. (2025, June 16). Israel says most Iranian missiles intercepted, but some hit targets. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-resilience-tested-iranian-missile-strikes-hit-home-2025-06-16/

Sábato, Jorge A. (2014). Estado, Política y Gestión de la Tecnología: Obras Escogidas (1962-1983) Harriague, Santiago & Domingo Quilici (Editores). UNSAM Edita.

SIPRI Arms Industry Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/armsindustry

Shelbey, H. (2025, June 18). Israel is running low on defensive interceptors, official says. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israel-is-running-low-on-defensive-interceptors-official-says-fd64163d

Shine, S. (2025, August 14). Iran’s strategic nuclear dilemma (INSS Insight No. 2025). Institute for National Security Studies. https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/No.-2025.pdf

Skoglund, P., Listou, T., & Ekström, T. (2022). Russian logistics in the Ukrainian war: Can operational failures be attributed to logistics? Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 5(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.158

Talmadge, C. (2015). The Dictator’s Army: Battlefield Effectiveness in Authoritarian Regimes. Cornell University Press.

Ti, Ronald y Kinsey, Christopher (2023) Lessons from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict: the primacy of logistics over strategy, Defence Studies, 23:3, 381-398, DOI: 10.1080/14702436.2023.2238613

Tobias Bunde and Sophie Eisentraut (eds.), Munich Security Report 2026: Under Destruction, Munich: Munich Security Conference, February 2026, https://securityconference.org/en/publications/munich-security-report/2026/

Tudosia, M. (2023, June 23). Lessons learned from Ukraine: Logistics. European Security & Defence. https://euro-sd.com/2023/06/articles/31845/lessons-learned-from-ukraine-logistics/

Wang, Dan (2023). China’s Hidden Tech Revolution. How Beijing Threatens U.S. Dominance. Wang, D. (2023). China’s hidden tech revolution: How Beijing threatens U.S. dominance. Foreign Affairs, 102(2), 72–81. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/chinas-hidden-tech-revolution

Watling, J., & Reynolds, N. (2025, 14 de febrero). Tactical Developments During the Third Year of the Russo–Ukrainian War. RUSI. https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/tactical-developments-during-third-year-russo-ukrainian-war

Watts, B. (2021). The air and missile war in Nagorno-Karabakh: Lessons for the future force. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

White, Sarah (2023). The Organizational Determinants of Military Doctrine: A History of Army Information Operations (Winter 2022/2023), Texas National Security Review, 6,1. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/items/2b5d4028-7609-4a73-9fef-70f21063d9c0/full

Descargas

Publicado

2026-04-30

Cómo citar

da Ponte, A., & Ocón, L. (2026). Lo viejo funciona: Tecnología, instituciones y guerra en tiempos de disrupción tecnológica . Estudios Sobre El Poder. Revista De Ciencia Política, 2(3). Recuperado a partir de https://ojs.unsj.edu.ar/index.php/epoder/article/view/1513