Envejecimiento y miopía social en los Estados Unidos
Keywords:
United States, Social Myopia, NeoliberalismAbstract
The United States confronts reconfigurations complicated by generational unbalances among its ethnic and racial groups. These unbalances, concerning population numbers and wealth distribution, foster a staunch individualism undermining the stability of collective support networks, such as that country’s social security system.
This paper highlights an everyday expression of such individualism to point at a social myopia in which, in an apparently inconsequential manner, short-term, individualistic interests erode the common good. It calls attention to the fact that a reluctance to share privileges and influence in accordance to the new social and racial percentages of the country challenges its widely claimed democratic principle of majority rule.
References
Baker, D. y Rosnick, D. (2009). The Wealth of the Baby Boom Cohorts after the Collapse of the Housing Bubble. CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2009-07, Center for Economic and Policy Research. Recuperado de http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/baby-boomer-wealth-2009-02.pdf.
Estes, C. L. (2011). “Crises and Old Age Policy”. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media.
Fontenot, K., Semega, J. y Kollar, M. (2018). Income and Poverty in the United States 2017. U.S. Census Bureau. Recuperado de https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2018/demo/p60263.html#:~:text=Median%20household%20income%20was%20%2461%2C372,percent%20from%202016%20to%20%2477%2C713.
Kochhar, R. y Cilluffo, A. (2017). How wealth inequality has changed in the U.S. since the Great Recession, by race, ethnicity and income. Estados Unidos, Pew Research Center. Recuperado de https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/01/how-wealth-inequality-has-changed-in-the-u-s-since-the-great-recession-by-race-ethnicity-and-income/.
Marshall, V. W. y Bengtson, V. L. (2011). “Theoretical Perspectives on the Sociology of Aging”. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media.
Peters, T. y Barletta, M. (2005). Trends: Recognize Analyze Capitalize. Estados Unidos, Dorling Kindersley. Recuperado de https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/.
Pfeffer, F. T. y Schoeni, R. F. (2016). “How Wealth Inequality Shapes Our Future”. Journal of the Social Sciences, Vol. 2, N°6, pp. 2-22. The Russell Sage Foundation.
Poston Jr., D. L. (2020). 3 ways that the U.S. population will change over the next decade. PBS News Hour. Recuperado de https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/3-ways-that-the-u-s-population-will-change-over-the-next-decade.
Quadagno, J., Lennox Kail, B. y Shekha, K. R. (2011). “Welfare States: Protecting or Risking Old Age. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media.
Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees. (2020). A Summary of the 2020 Annual Reports: https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/
Social Security Fact Sheet (2020). Recuperad de https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/basicfact- alt.pdf.
Vandenbroucke, G. y Zhu, H. (2017). “Aging and Wealth Inequality”. Economic Synopses #2. Estados Unidos, Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis.
Wassel, J. I. (2011). “Business and Aging: The Boomer Effect on Consumers and Marketing”. En Settersten Jr., R. A. y Angel, J. L. (ed.) Handbook of Sociology of Aging. Estados Unidos, Springer Science and Business Media. Recuperado de https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-1-4419-7374-0.