Mujeres, Conocimiento Y Filosofía En La Modernidad Temprana: Una Historia Alternativa
Barra lateral del artículo
Publicado:
Jul 7, 2025
Palabras clave:
Filósofas Modernas, Conocimiento, Filosofía
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Durante el siglo XX, las teorías feministas y los estudios sociales de la ciencia permitieron la revaloración del papel de la mujer en la construcción de la ciencia y la filosofía, especialmente desde la modernidad temprana en adelante. Estos recientes estudios historiográficos y filosóficos comprenden suficiente evidencia sobre la activa participación de las mujeres en la producción de conocimiento filosófico-natural de esta época. El objetivo del presente texto es mostrar cómo a partir de los desarrollos de la historia y filosofía de la ciencia feministas ha sido posible construir una historia del conocimiento alternativa a la del canon tradicional. Se espera mostrar que, atendiendo a estos avances y mediante la lectura de filósofas, es posible ampliar nuestra comprensión de la filosofía moderna en su diversidad de sus temas, problemas y agentes que han sido invisibilizados a lo largo de la historia.
Detalles del artículo
Cómo citar
Cardona Fuentes, M. J. (2025). Mujeres, Conocimiento Y Filosofía En La Modernidad Temprana: Una Historia Alternativa. TRAZOS – Revista De Estudiantes De Filosofía, 2(8), 52-64. Recuperado a partir de https://ojs.unsj.edu.ar/index.php/trazos/article/view/1406
Sección
Dossier
Citas
Anderson, E. (1995). Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense. Hypatia, 10(3), 50-84.
Beard, M. R. (1968). On understanding women. New York, Greenwood Press. http://archive.org/details/onunderstandingw0000bear
Bordo, S. (1987). The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. State University of New York Press.
Bowler, P. J., & Morus, I. R. (2007). Panorama general de la ciencia moderna. Crítica.
Cavendish, M. (2001). Observations upon Experimental Philosophy (E. O’Neill, Ed.; 1.a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164504
Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585 Fricker, M. (2011). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing (Repr). Oxford University Press.
Funkenstein, A. (2018). Theology and the scientific imagination from the Middle Ages to the seventeenth century (Second edition). Princeton University Press.
Hagengruber, R. E. (2020). The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 43-64). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_4
Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (2003). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (2. ed). Kluwer.
Hartsock, N. C. M. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. En S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering Reality (Vol. 161, pp. 283-310). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15
Hirschmann, N. J., & McClure, K. M. (Eds.). (2007). Feminist interpretations of John Locke. Pennsylvania State University Press. Hirschmann, N. J., & Wright, J. H. (Eds.). (2012). Feminist interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hutton, S. (2019). Women, philosophy and the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27(4), 684-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1563766
Hutton, S. (2020). “Context” and “Fortuna” in the History of Women Philosophers: A Diachronic Perspective. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 29-42). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_3 Jacobson, A. J. (Ed.). (2000). Feminist interpretations of David Hume. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Keller, E. F. (1995). Reflections on gender and science (10th anniversary edition). Yale University Press.
Kragh, H. (1989). Introducción a la historia de la ciencia. Crítica.
Manzo, S. (2022). Filósofas y filósofos de la modernidad. Nuevas perspectivas y materiales para el estudio. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de la Plata.
Merchant, C. (1989). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper & Row.
Monroy, N. (2003). Epistemología y sujeto en la filosofía antimecanicista de Margaret Cavendish. 29(3), 185-198.
O’Neill, E. (1997). Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History. En J. A. Kourany (Ed.), Philosophy in a Feminist Voice (pp. 17-62). Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, E. (2005). Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy. Hypatia, 20(3), 185-197.
Rossiter, M. W. (1980). «Women’s Work» in Science, 1880-1910. Isis, 71(3), 381- 398.
Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004
Schiebinger, L. (1996). The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science (1. Harvard Univ. Press paperback ed., 6th print). Harvard Univ. Press.
Schiebinger, L. (2004). Nature’s body: Gender in the making of modern science.
Rutgers University Press. Schott, R. M. (Ed.). (1997). Feminist interpretations of Immanuel Kant. Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
Waithe, M. E. (1991). A History of Women Philosophers: Modern Women Philosophers, 1600–1900. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Waithe, M. E. (2020). Sex, Lies, and Bigotry: The Canon of Philosophy. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 3-17). Springer International Publishing.
Wilkins, E. (2014). Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 68(3), 245-260.
Witt, C. (2020). The Recognition Project: Feminist History of Philosophy. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 19- 28). Springer International Publishing.
Beard, M. R. (1968). On understanding women. New York, Greenwood Press. http://archive.org/details/onunderstandingw0000bear
Bordo, S. (1987). The flight to objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and culture. State University of New York Press.
Bowler, P. J., & Morus, I. R. (2007). Panorama general de la ciencia moderna. Crítica.
Cavendish, M. (2001). Observations upon Experimental Philosophy (E. O’Neill, Ed.; 1.a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164504
Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585 Fricker, M. (2011). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing (Repr). Oxford University Press.
Funkenstein, A. (2018). Theology and the scientific imagination from the Middle Ages to the seventeenth century (Second edition). Princeton University Press.
Hagengruber, R. E. (2020). The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 43-64). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_4
Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (2003). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (2. ed). Kluwer.
Hartsock, N. C. M. (2004). The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. En S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering Reality (Vol. 161, pp. 283-310). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48017-4_15
Hirschmann, N. J., & McClure, K. M. (Eds.). (2007). Feminist interpretations of John Locke. Pennsylvania State University Press. Hirschmann, N. J., & Wright, J. H. (Eds.). (2012). Feminist interpretations of Thomas Hobbes. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hutton, S. (2019). Women, philosophy and the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27(4), 684-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1563766
Hutton, S. (2020). “Context” and “Fortuna” in the History of Women Philosophers: A Diachronic Perspective. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 29-42). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_3 Jacobson, A. J. (Ed.). (2000). Feminist interpretations of David Hume. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Keller, E. F. (1995). Reflections on gender and science (10th anniversary edition). Yale University Press.
Kragh, H. (1989). Introducción a la historia de la ciencia. Crítica.
Manzo, S. (2022). Filósofas y filósofos de la modernidad. Nuevas perspectivas y materiales para el estudio. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de la Plata.
Merchant, C. (1989). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper & Row.
Monroy, N. (2003). Epistemología y sujeto en la filosofía antimecanicista de Margaret Cavendish. 29(3), 185-198.
O’Neill, E. (1997). Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History. En J. A. Kourany (Ed.), Philosophy in a Feminist Voice (pp. 17-62). Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, E. (2005). Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy. Hypatia, 20(3), 185-197.
Rossiter, M. W. (1980). «Women’s Work» in Science, 1880-1910. Isis, 71(3), 381- 398.
Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004
Schiebinger, L. (1996). The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science (1. Harvard Univ. Press paperback ed., 6th print). Harvard Univ. Press.
Schiebinger, L. (2004). Nature’s body: Gender in the making of modern science.
Rutgers University Press. Schott, R. M. (Ed.). (1997). Feminist interpretations of Immanuel Kant. Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
Waithe, M. E. (1991). A History of Women Philosophers: Modern Women Philosophers, 1600–1900. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Waithe, M. E. (2020). Sex, Lies, and Bigotry: The Canon of Philosophy. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 3-17). Springer International Publishing.
Wilkins, E. (2014). Margaret Cavendish and the Royal Society. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, 68(3), 245-260.
Witt, C. (2020). The Recognition Project: Feminist History of Philosophy. En S. Thorgeirsdottir & R. E. Hagengruber (Eds.), Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 19- 28). Springer International Publishing.