Archival issues: methodological reflections within the contextof academic production in the field of the humanities

Main Article Content

Alejandro De Oto
Juan Martin Masciardi Recabarren

Abstract

This dossier proposes a methodological and epistemological reflection on the archive in the humanities. Born from a persistent observation in the teaching of research methodology, it approaches the archive not as a mere repository of sources but as an operative category that condenses tensions between tradition and creation, canon and heterogeneity, epistemic authority and critical dimension. The three articles gathered here explore, from different perspectives, the ways in which the archive configures the contours of the thinkable: the pedagogy of silence and the operations that render legible the gaps of the corpus; the production of inexistent archives through generative artificial intelligence as a xenofeminist political gesture; and the methodological problems and decisions raised by a fragmentary and unpublished epistolary archive. Together, the works collected here maintain that interrogating the archive means problematizing the conditions of knowledge production, and that every methodology is, in this sense, a political position.

Article Details

How to Cite
De Oto, A., & Masciardi Recabarren, J. M. (2026). Archival issues: methodological reflections within the contextof academic production in the field of the humanities. TRAZOS – Revista De Filosofía, 1(10), 8–15. Retrieved from https://ojs.unsj.edu.ar/index.php/trazos/article/view/1730
Section
Editorial

References

Deleuze, G. (2018). Cine 2: Los signos del movimiento y el tiempo. Cactus.

Derrida, Jacques (1997). Mal de archivo. Una impresión freudiana. Trotta.

Foucault, M. (2008). La arqueología del saber. Siglo XXI.

Foucault, M. (2025). El discurso filosófico. Siglo XXI

Rufer, M. (2016). El archivo: de la metáfora extractiva a la ruptura poscolonial. En M. Rufer & F. Gorbach (Coords.), (In) disciplinar la investigación: archivo, trabajo de campo y escritura (pp. 159-186). Siglo XXI.