PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The works received will be reviewed, in the first instance, by the Management and/or the
Editorial Committee, who will determine the originality and relevance of their publication. All
selected manuscripts that require it, according to the section, will be sent to external evaluation
where they will be graded according to one of the following categories:
-Unconditional acceptance (publish without changes).
-Acceptance with observations (publish once suggested modifications have been made).
-I reject it (not recommended for publication).
Manuscripts submitted to the Dossier, Research Articles, and Conference Papers sections will
undergo an anonymous, double-blind peer review process. This means that authors will not
know their reviewers, and reviewers will not know the authors of the assigned works. Authors
will receive feedback with suggestions, comments, and observations from the reviewers. In the
event of conflicting evaluations, a third review will be conducted to break the tie. The final
decision will be final.
Works published in the Book Reviews and Philosophical Essays sections will not be subject to
the strict academic standards of external review. However, they will be evaluated by the Editorial
Committee. This flexibility does not eliminate the mandatory use of APA style or general criteria
common to all sections.
Finally, the selected works will be subject to a style correction to ensure the quality of spelling
and writing, as well as the editorial policies of the magazine: works that undermine intellectual
honesty (plagiarism, double publication) will not be accepted, as well as content that incites or
promotes hate/violence speeches that threaten human and non-human forms of life.