EDITORIAL

Abstract

How does the canon operate? Since when? What script do you use? Is there a single canon, or are they rather epochal and plural crystallizations that seek to regulate them? These questions occur to us, unfinished questions as triggers to deal with the letters of the matter and make or receive a contribution. Not satisfied with the problems, readings and authors that the current philosophical canon presents, we choose to look away and attend to what is not contained in the curricular space of our Philosophy degree. We say divert and not ignore. We do not ignore the canon; as students of philosophy we recognize ourselves in it, we know we have been shaped by it, but we also know that we want to transform ourselves, allow ourselves to be and think differently; hence the urgent need for a diversion, or a possible crossing of its limits.